2014 Landmark Conference Men's Lacrosse Championship

Top four seeds qualify for postseason

Semifinals: April 30, 2014 (at highest seeds)
No. 4 Drew at No. 1 Susquehanna
SUS 9-4
Box Score
No. 3 Goucher at No. 2 Scranton
GOU 8-4
Box Score Recap
Championship: May 3, 2014 (at highest seed)
No. 3 Goucher at No. 1 Susquehanna
SUS 9-6
Box Score Recap


2014 Landmark Conference Men's Lacrosse Champions
Susquehanna University


Landmark Men's Lacrosse Championship History
2013 Susquehanna
2012 Goucher
2011 Scranton
2010 Goucher
2009 USMMA
2008 Drew


Tiebreaking Procedures

In the event two (or more) teams tie in the conference standings, the following procedure shall be used to determine seeding for the championship:

1. Head-to-head record amongst all tied teams in contests that count toward the conference standings
2. Comparison of tied teams’ records against remaining teams in conference standings in descending order (starting at No. 1)
3. Goal differential in games played amongst tied teams, with a maximum differential of seven goals per game
4. Road winning percentage in conference games (only if tied teams played the same number of away conference games)
5. Head-to-head results between and among all tied teams in all regular season contests (only if tied teams played the same amount of contests against other tied teams)
6. Head-to-head record against common non-conference opponents at same site
7. Head-to-head record against common non-conference opponents at different site
8. Coin flip (or similar random action)

Application of Tie-Breaking Procedure
In a tie of more than two teams, tie-breakers shall be applied in descending order until a team or a group of teams have gained an advantage and the initial tie has been broken. Teams shall be seeded accordingly based upon where they rank within the group of tied teams. If a sub-group (or groups) of tied teams are created by applying tie-breaking criteria to the original group, the tie-breaking process begins anew for the sub-group (or groups) until all teams can be seeded.

In a tie of more than two teams, when a random action is used to break the tie, the tie-breaking process shall begin anew starting with the first criteria (head-to-head) once one team has gained the advantage.

In the event of multiple ties in the standings, the ties will be broken in descending order, unless a lower seeded tie can be broken by using the first criteria (head-to-head). When comparing tied teams against positions lower in the standings which are also tied, those “lower tied positions” shall be considered as a “single position” for purposes of comparison, unless those “lower tied positions” were broken through head-to-head comparison.

If two or more groups of teams are tied, the seeding for one group of tied teams, even if determined by a random action, shall be considered for tie-breaking purposes for any remaining groups.