Landmark Member Sites

Recent Scores

05/17 wlax at Cortland St. L, 13-12
05/16 wlax vs. Mount Union W, 21-8
05/14 bsb vs. Johns Hopkins L, 15-3
05/13 bsb vs. Alvernia L, 3-2
05/10 wlax vs. Western New Eng. W, 22-5

Upcoming Games

No events to show.
Close

Recent Scores

05/10 wten at Juniata L, 5-0
05/09 wten vs. Misericordia W, 5-1
05/06 wlax at Arcadia L, 14-11
04/28 sball vs. Yeshiva W, 13-2
04/28 sball vs. Yeshiva W, 15-0

Upcoming Games

No events to show.
Close

Recent Scores

05/08 wten vs. SUNY Geneseo L, 5-0
05/03 bsb at Moravian L, 7-3
05/02 sball vs. Moravian L, 12-2
05/02 sball vs. Moravian L, 4-3
05/02 bsb at Moravian W, 7-4

Upcoming Games

No events to show.
Close

Recent Scores

05/02 mten at Juniata L, 5-3
04/29 wlax at Catholic L, 17-4
04/28 mten vs. Moravian W, 5-1
04/25 wlax vs. Drew W, 12-10
04/25 mlax at Scranton L, 9-8

Upcoming Games

No events to show.
Close

Recent Scores

05/10 wten vs. Drew W, 5-0
05/09 mten vs. Emory L, 5-0
05/09 wten vs. FDU-Florham W, 5-0
05/08 mten vs. Messiah W, 5-3
05/02 mten vs. Goucher W, 5-3

Upcoming Games

No events to show.
Close

Recent Scores

05/03 bsb vs. Catholic L, 7-5
05/02 bsb vs. Catholic W, 13-11
05/02 wten at Elizabethtown L, 5-2
05/02 mlax vs. Catholic L, 5-4
05/02 bsb vs. Catholic L, 7-1

Upcoming Games

No events to show.
Close

Recent Scores

05/02 wlax at Catholic L, 22-9
05/02 sball vs. Moravian L, 1-0
05/02 sball vs. Catholic W, 10-1
05/01 sball vs. Elizabethtown L, 3-1
04/29 wlax at Scranton W, 16-10

Upcoming Games

No events to show.
Close

Recent Scores

05/10 mten vs. Moravian L, 5-2
05/09 mten at Stevenson W, 5-2
04/28 bsb at Old Westbury L, 6-1
04/28 mten at Juniata L, 5-0
04/27 wlax at Old Westbury L, 13-1

Upcoming Games

No events to show.
Close

Men's Tennis

 

2014 Landmark Conference Men's Tennis Championship

Top four seeds qualify for postseason

Semifinals: April 23, 2014 (at highest seeds)
No. 4 Moravian at No. 1 Juniata
JUN 5-1
Box Score
Recap
No. 3 Scranton at No. 2 Catholic
CUA 5-1
Box Score Recap
       
Championship: April 27, 2014 (Huntingdon, Pa.)
No. 2 Catholic at No. 1 Juniata
CUA 5-4
Box Score Recap

 

2014 Landmark Conference Men's Tennis Champions
Catholic University

 

Landmark Men's Tennis Championship History
2013 Drew
2012 Drew
2011 Drew
2010 Drew
2009 Drew
2008 Drew

 


Tiebreaking Procedures

In the event two (or more) teams tie in the conference standings, the following procedure shall be used to determine seeding for the championship:

1. Head-to-head record amongst all tied teams in contests that count toward the conference standings
2. Comparison of tied teams’ records against remaining teams in conference standings in descending order (starting at No. 1)
3. Match differential (W-L) in matches played amongst tied teams
4. Set differential (W-L) in matches played amongst tied teams
5. Comparison of games lost in matches played amongst tied teams, with the team(s) owning the lowest total gaining the advantage
6. Head-to-head results between and among all tied teams in all regular season contests (only if tied teams played the same amount of contests against other tied teams)
7. Head-to-head record against common non-conference opponents at same site
8. Head-to-head record against common non-conference opponents at different site
9. Coin flip (or similar random action)

Application of Tie-Breaking Procedure
In a tie of more than two teams, tie-breakers shall be applied in descending order until a team or a group of teams have gained an advantage and the initial tie has been broken. Teams shall be seeded accordingly based upon where they rank within the group of tied teams. If a sub-group (or groups) of tied teams are created by applying tie-breaking criteria to the original group, the tie-breaking process begins anew for the sub-group (or groups) until all teams can be seeded.

In a tie of more than two teams, when a random action is used to break the tie, the tie-breaking process shall begin anew starting with the first criteria (head-to-head) once one team has gained the advantage.

In the event of multiple ties in the standings, the ties will be broken in descending order, unless a lower seeded tie can be broken by using the first criteria (head-to-head). When comparing tied teams against positions lower in the standings which are also tied, those “lower tied positions” shall be considered as a “single position” for purposes of comparison, unless those “lower tied positions” were broken through head-to-head comparison.

If two or more groups of teams are tied, the seeding for one group of tied teams, even if determined by a random action, shall be considered for tie-breaking purposes for any remaining groups.


Today's Games

No events to show