2013-14 Landmark Conference Women's Baskeball Championship
Top four seeds qualify for postseason
|Semifinals: February 26, 2014 (at highest seeds)|
|No. 4 Juniata at No. 1 Scranton
|No. 3 Moravian at No. 2 Catholic
||MOR 66-65 OT
1, 2014 (at highest seed)
|No. 3 Moravian at No. 1 Scranton
2014 Landmark Conference
Women's Basketball Champions
University of Scranton
|Landmark Women's Basketball Championship History|
In the event two (or more) teams
tie in the conference standings, the following procedure shall be
used to determine seeding for the championship:
1. Head-to-head record amongst all tied teams in contests that count toward the conference standings
2. Comparison of tied teams’ records against remaining teams in conference standings in descending order (starting at No. 1)
3. Head-to-head results between and among all tied teams in all regular season contests (only if tied teams played the same amount of contests against other tied teams)
4. Head-to-head record against common non-conference opponents at same site
5. Head-to-head record against common non-conference opponents at different site
6. Road winning percentage in conference games (only if tied teams played the same number of away conference games)
7. Strength-of-schedule comparison, as it appears in the NCAA ranking process
8. NCAA Regional Rankings comparison, for the rankings available at the time of selection, with the highest ranked team earning the advantage (as long as all tied teams are ranked in the same region)
9. Coin flip (or similar random action)
Application of Tie-Breaking Procedure
In a tie of more than two teams, tie-breakers shall be applied in descending order until a team or a group of teams have gained an advantage and the initial tie has been broken. Teams shall be seeded accordingly based upon where they rank within the group of tied teams. If a sub-group (or groups) of tied teams are created by applying tie-breaking criteria to the original group, the tie-breaking process begins anew for the sub-group (or groups) until all teams can be seeded.
In a tie of more than two teams, when a random action is used to break the tie, the tie-breaking process shall begin anew starting with the first criteria (head-to-head) once one team has gained the advantage.
In the event of multiple ties in the standings, the ties will be broken in descending order, unless a lower seeded tie can be broken by using the first criteria (head-to-head). When comparing tied teams against positions lower in the standings which are also tied, those “lower tied positions” shall be considered as a “single position” for purposes of comparison, unless those “lower tied positions” were broken through head-to-head comparison.
If two or more groups of teams are tied, the seeding for one group of tied teams, even if determined by a random action, shall be considered for tie-breaking purposes for any remaining groups.